Liberty PHIL 201 Quiz 6 Answers Complete Solutions
Dialogical views of faith and reason see the two as dialogue partners, primarily because both Scripture and creation are forms of revelation that originate from God.
Evidentialism is an example of an internalist approach to faith and reason.
Which church fathers are known for starting the debate over reason’s/philosophy’s role in faith and theology?
Which Christian philosopher below, is NOT listed by the authors as one who pushes back on evidentialism?
Fine-tuning arguments claim that a super-intellect (God) is responsible for which realities?
The authors note that in John Calvin’s Institutes, Calvin says that all men innately have:
Fine-Tuning arguments contend that evolution must be false because the bible says God created the world in 6 days.
Which of the following is NOT a reason for viewing the relationship of faith and reason as a dialogue?
“Reason as Magistrate” gets its name because it was the view of the Magisterial Reformers of the Protestant Reformation.
The “Insufficient Evidence” objection by argues which of the following:
Which philosopher and theologian argued that reason and philosophy should be used as a subservient partners or servants to theology?
Which NT text do the author’s NOT give as foundational for the basis of Natural Revelation and Natural Theology?
The authors quote Polkinghorne who argues that the Natural theology’s collapse was due to what kind of discovery?
Natural revelation is sometimes also referred to as:
Citing Gillespie, the authors note that William Paley’s design argument was effectively defeated by which figure?
In response to the “who designed God?” objection, which is not given as a possible explanation for the beginning of the universe?
Wait.... Hire Me To Get 100% Original Help In . Watch The Video Below For More Information & How It Works!
Name: Jennifer Lucas
Status: Online ⬤
Classes Taken: 3878
The authors note 3 distinct affirmations by Paul in Romans 1:18-21. Which is NOT one?
The authors note that since Hume is right – arguments from analogy never render complete certainty – they are unhelpful to apologists and should be avoided in favor of other arguments.
The Intelligent Design movements challenges the explanatory sufficiency of:
Historically, Christians have always accepted natural theology, while non-Christian scientists and philosophers have been the ones who criticize it.
The authors understand the concept of “faith” to be a kind of blind leap based on optimism and positive thinking.
According to the authors, this Enlightenment philosopher thought we could identify universal methods of thinking that could be applied to all people in all places.
According to Fideism, “Truth” (at least the kind of truth that should concern us most) should be grasped through which of the following?
Which is one of the concerns about adopting pragmatism, given by the authors?
Fideism comes from the Latin word fides, which translates to “blind leap” in English.
The “Problem of Evil” objection by Hume, according to the authors, gives responding apologists what kind of opportunity:
A “theodicy” is:
David Hume was a famous Enlightenment proponent of arguments for God’s existence from Natural theology.
Kierkegaard saw the quest for objectivity as:
Which view of faith and reason is commonly associated with Anselm of Canterbury?
The authors push back on the “Warfare Thesis” with all of the points below EXCEPT?
The view of faith and reason the authors call “Reason as Magistrate” is characteristic of what time period in western history?